Biodynamics

2. BIODYNAMICS

(therapeutic work with fundamental frequencies)

I. Inner Mode

Method's Worldview The human being is a holistic system embedded in a field of interactions. The restoration of harmony is connected with a return to fundamental rhythms and self-regulation.

What Is Considered Reality Reality encompasses the somatic level and the informational-field level, where disturbances are registered and correction is possible.

What Is an Event Within the Method An event is a configuration of phenomena within the human system that may be "held in place" by informational and somatic tensions.

Role of the Subject The patient is an active participant in self-cleansing / self-restoration. The therapist is a guide of attunement and support.

Role of Time The moment of attunement (T0) and the period of restructuring / integration (T1).

Purpose of the Method To initiate self-cleansing and restoration of wholeness in the patient through gentle frequency interaction.

Language and Key Concepts Fundamental frequencies / rhythms, attunement, resonance, field, informational cleansing, self-regulation, harmonization.

Principles Governing the Transmission of Knowledge [Principles of knowledge transmission in this tradition are being documented together with method masters]

II. Analytical Mode

Origin Contemporary proprietary method (school and lineage to be confirmed upon expert card verification).

Functional Type Transformation (F5), calibration (F6); diagnosis (F1) as preliminary assessment of condition.

Data Type D4 — intersubjective field (dominant); D2 — somatic data (secondary).

Interpretation Mechanism C4 — Interactive (interaction of the states of therapist and patient).

Temporal Granularity T0 (moment of session), T1 (period of integration).

Level of Determinism Probabilistic / transformational — does not guarantee results; works as a modification of the conditions of the system's state.

Scale of Applicability Individual.

Limitations Dependence on the therapist's qualification and the patient's readiness. Subjectivity of outcome criteria. Necessity of clear boundaries of competence.

Ethical Risks Promises of "healing." Substitution of medical assistance. Vulnerability of the client in an altered state.

Degree of Verifiability Low in the strict scientific sense; partial at the level of case descriptions when protocols are maintained.

III. Comparative Mode

Intersections by Data Type D4 is shared by Systemic Constellations and Shamanic Practices — all work with the intersubjective field as the primary source of data.

Intersections by Mechanism C4 (interactive) intersects with Mindfulness / Attention Practices and Systemic Constellations — the common principle of change through interaction of states.

Differences in Ontology The field / informational level as working reality — in contrast to empirical-statistical (Big Five) and symbolic (astrology) models.

Differences in Level of Determinism Claims the possibility of influence without rigid predictability of outcome — softer than cyclical systems (C2), and without type fixation as in structural systems (C1).

Areas of Partial Compatibility With psychological models — in the realm of working with states and patterns. With medicine — only with strict delineation of tasks and competencies.